Home Cryptocurrency Regulation Telegram Case: New Player Joined In

Telegram Case: New Player Joined In

Before the Court makes a decision, it should thoroughly analyze the case

Telegram Case: New Player Joined In

Telegram is still at odds with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The messenger has been taken to court by the Commission. The case is on, and new players are weighing in.

Telegram might make use of the latest document submitted to the court. Lilya Tessler, counsel to the Chamber of Digital Commerce, authored an amicus brief. It’s a legal document that gives an external party the right to submit its opinion to the court.

Such a document got submitted on January 21st. In it, the Chamber notes, “although the Chamber does not have a view on whether the offer and sale of Grams is a securities transaction, the Chamber has an interest in ensuring that the legal framework applied to digital assets underlying an investment contract is clear and consistent.”

Time for a proper analysis

The Chamber advocates a two-layer analysis. It asks the court to thoroughly consider what the term “digital assets” means. Accordingly, the court needs to understand whether there is an investment contract that is offered in a securities transaction. And whether the investment contract envisions a commodity that is subject to a traditional commercial transaction.

To remind, this is where the essence of the dispute lies. The two parties are trying to determine whether a token sale constitutes an investment contract. According to Telegram, Gram investors should not expect profits for buying and holding the token. Hence, they argue, the token isn’t a security.

The Chamber also asked the court to take into account the fact that digital assets shouldn’t be qualified as securities just because they’re based on blockchain. It also added that the disclosures required by the securities laws “serve little purpose with respect to commercial transactions in the digital assets themselves.”

Besides, the Chamber suggested that more agencies should scrutinize the matter. Not just the SEC. These agencies include, for instance, CFTC. The issue may also be subject to “the Bank Secrecy Act, federal and state consumer protection laws, state money transmitter licensing laws, and state laws specific to virtual currency transactions, such as New York’s Virtual Currency Business Activity law.”

Recently, Altcoin Buzz reported that Telegram cleared the air regarding the project. In an official press release, Telegram elucidated TON’s setup and its regulatory compliance.



  1. OMG! I thought that this was at least one of the days I did not read the news about Telegram problems. This no longer seems funny to me.
    But what if it somehow affects users? Idk what will happen next with Telegram and its owners, but it’s better to use another application instead. At least Utopia because there all the data is safe.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.