AltcoinBuzzAltcoinBuzz
Subscribe
  • Crypto News
  • Crypto Research
  • Technical Analysis
AltcoinBuzzAltcoinBuzz

An independent digital media outlet delivering crypto research, news, and technical analysis to a community of 600,000+ users.

Discover

  • Crypto Research
  • Crypto News
  • Technical Analysis
  • Key Opinions
  • Upcoming Launches

Categories

  • Bitcoin BTC
  • RWA
  • Technology
  • Altcoins
  • Regulation

Company

  • Affiliates
  • Partners & Sponsors
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Terms of Use
  • Subscription Terms
  • About the ALTCOINBUZZ
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact ALTCOINBUZZ
  • Advertise with us

Copyright 2026 ALTCOINBUZZ. All rights reserved.Something is buzzzzzzzing.
HomeCrypto NewsThe SEC Goes after The Popular ICOrating Website in Search of Justice
Crypto NewsRegulation

The SEC Goes after The Popular ICOrating Website in Search of Justice

ICOrating paid fines that totaled almost $270,000 for producing reports and ratings for ICO's that were actually paid advertisements.

VVictor•Aug 21, 2019
ICOrating-slapped-with-huge-fine-by-the-SEC.jpg

The 2017/2018 ICO craze hasn’t gone under the radar. In a recent press release from the SEC, ICOrating had to pay nearly $270,000 in fines for actions they took in 2017.

ICORating, a Russia-based analytics firm, was fined by the SEC for failing to not share payments on positively reviewed ICO’s. A common issue many influencers faced after the 2017 initial coin offering craze. A simple #advertisement could have deterred any action by the Securities and Exchange Commission.

In a recent press release by the Securities and Exchange Commission, it was revealed that ICOrating agreed to pay a $268,998 fine “to settle charges that it failed to disclose payments received from issuers for publicizing their digital asset securities offerings.”

ICOrating was and still is a go-to website for learning more about a company that’s raising funds via cryptocurrency. Their goal is to provide a legitimate review of those individual companies. But, how can it be legitimate if the review is being affected by payments? This is an issue for their mission “to help the market achieve the necessary standards of quality, transparency and reliability.”

Coindesk reported that Melissa Hodgman of the SEC’s Enforcement Division said they violated Section 17(b) of the Securities Act of 1933:

“The securities laws require promoters, including both people and entities, to disclose compensation they receive for touting investments so that potential investors are aware they are viewing a paid promotional item. This requirement applies regardless of whether the securities being touted are issued using traditional certificates or on the blockchain.”

That’s right folks, a law written in 1933 still applies today to the cryptocurrency and blockchain world. Do you think this is a sign that the cryptocurrency market is maturing, thanks to the SEC? The SEC is on a mission to put companies in order for previous malpractices. Is that a good thing for crypto?

Related

web_Casper-unveils.jpg
Crypto News
May 14, 2026

Casper Just Dropped a Huge Roadmap for RWAs and the Machine Economy

Casper Network is betting big on EVM support, AI payments, and quantum-safe blockchain infrastructure with its new multi-year roadmap.

Saloni Rathi
Awesome-Web-Images-4.jpg
Crypto News
Apr 24, 2026

Microsoft-Backed Space and Time Just Launched a No-Code App Builder

Microsoft's bet on Space and Time is starting to pay off with the launch of Dreamspace, a no code app builder

Stu L
Awesome-Web-Images-3.jpg
Crypto News
Apr 20, 2026

The New World ID Just Dropped. And It’s Proof of Human

Worldcoin's World ID is now live and updated. It's out to prove you are human when on the web instead of dealing with a bot.

Stu L