BA and CFAT Sue SEC Over Dealer Rule Expansion

This lawsuit challenges the SEC’s recent expansion of the definition of ‘dealer’ under its Dealer Rule.

The plaintiffs argue this could severely impact the digital asset industry. Let’s discover more about this important news for the SEC.

Legal Challenge to SEC’s Dealer Rule Definition

The SEC’s Dealer Rule has stirred controversy by broadening the scope of what constitutes a dealer in securities. This expansion is particularly contentious because it now potentially includes various entities dealing with digital assets. The Blockchain Association and CFAT are seeking a court order to strike down this rule. They argue it unfairly classifies digital asset technology as securities without addressing industry concerns or its unique aspects.

According to the lawsuit, the SEC did not engage substantively with stakeholders during the rule’s commentary period. Industry representatives questioned how the expanded definition would apply to digital asset operations. The plaintiffs argue that the SEC’s lack of clear guidance on these rules for digital assets shows a disregard for constructive feedback. This oversight highlights the practical implications of such regulatory expansion.

The Blockchain Association and CFAT argue that the SEC’s approach could stifle innovation and restrict the growth of the crypto market in the U.S. By expanding the dealer definition to cover common digital asset activities, the rule introduces stringent regulatory burdens. These burdens could drive operators offshore or out of the market, harming the U.S. economy and diminishing the global competitiveness of U.S. companies.

More About The SEC Lawsuit

The lawsuit also highlights concerns about the rule’s impact on smaller businesses and startups in the crypto sector. These entities may face disproportionate challenges due to the increased compliance costs and regulatory complexities introduced by the Dealer Rule. This could potentially lead to a decrease in entrepreneurial activity and innovation within the digital asset space.

As this legal battle unfolds, it will be closely watched by regulators, industry participants, and legal experts alike. The outcome of this lawsuit could have far-reaching implications for the regulation of digital assets in the United States, setting a precedent for how similar cases might be handled in the future and shaping the landscape of digital finance.



The information discussed by Altcoin Buzz is not financial advice. This is for educational, entertainment, and informational purposes only. Any information or strategies are thoughts and opinions relevant to the accepted levels of risk tolerance of the writer/reviewers and their risk tolerance may be different than yours. We are not responsible for any losses that you may incur as a result of any investments directly or indirectly related to the information provided. Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies are high-risk investments so please do your due diligence. Copyright Altcoin Buzz Pte Ltd.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.